Cases 1 - 10 of 10
TITCHENELL v. GREENE COUNTY et al
as 2:2022cv00890
Defendant:
ROBERT J. RHODES, GREENE COUNTY, JEFF RHODES and others
Plaintiff:
KELLY D. TITCHENELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
BRETT v. BIDEN et al
as 2:2018cv04738
Defendant:
MONSIGNOR LYNN, BARRY KNIGHT, KEN BRETT and others
Plaintiff:
FRANK BRETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv01388
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
SEWELL et al v. DUBS et al
as 1:2013cv01212
Plaintiff:
Gregory Lee Sewell and Kristen H. Sewell
Defendant:
Dwayne Dubs, Daniel S. Bowman, Hanover Police Dept. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SEWELL et al v. DUBS et al
as 2:2013cv02178
Plaintiff:
GREGORY LEE SEWELL and KRISTEN H. SEWELL
Defendant:
DWAYNE DUBS, DANIEL S. BOWMAN, HANOVER POLICE DEPT. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BRETT v. GREENE et al
as 2:2012cv03589
Plaintiff:
FRANK BRETT
Defendant:
DWAYNE GREENE, RICHARD + MARION + RICHY+ CAROLINE GERTZ FAMILY and DAVID DODGE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Levine v. Kelly Services, Inc.
as 4:2008cv00170
Plaintiff:
Richie F. Levine
Defendant:
Kelly Services, Inc. and Kelly Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2008cv00114
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Levine v. Kelly Services, Inc. et al
as 4:2007cv01966
Plaintiff:
Richie F. Levine
Defendant:
Kelly Services, Inc. and Verifications, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Levine v. Walmart Stores, Inc. et al
as 4:2007cv01856
Plaintiff:
Richie F. Levine
Defendant:
Walmart Stores, Inc. and General Information Services
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
