Cases 11 - 20 of 125
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00609
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022at00375
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv03020
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Briones v. Reubart et al
as 3:2022cv00087
Petitioner:
Richi Briones
Respondent:
William Reubart and Nevada Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Kamilchu v. County of Sacramento et al
as 1:2021cv01709
Plaintiff:
Eduard Kamilchu
Defendant:
County of Sacramento, Scott R. Jones, Iangarue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Kamilchu v. County of Sacramento et al
as 2:2021cv02245
Plaintiff:
Eduard Kamilchu
Defendant:
County of Sacramento, Scott R. Jones, Iangarue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rune Kraft v. CRH PLC et al
as 2:2021cv09014
Plaintiff:
Rune Kraft
Defendant:
CRH plc, CRH Americas Incorporated, CRH Americas Materials Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Richie Carver v. Attorney General for the State, et al
as 21-16407
Petitioner / Appellant:
RICHIE LEE CARVER
Respondent / Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA and DAVID SHINN, Director
Respondent:
CHARLES L. RYAN
Maryann Castillo v. Target Corporation et al
as 8:2021cv01379
Plaintiff:
Maryann Castillo
Defendant:
Target Corporation, Richie Rosilyn and Does 1 through 100, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Maryann Castillo v. Target Corporation et al
as 2:2021cv06766
Plaintiff:
Maryann Castillo
Defendant:
TARGET CORPORATION, RICHIE ROSILYN and Does 1 through 100, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
