Cases 31 - 40 of 134
Bolden v. Brown et al
as 8:2022cv03062
Plaintiff:
Iric Bolden
Defendant:
Michael Brown, Florence County Detention Center, Sheriff TJ Joye and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Landholt v. Richland County, South Carolina et al
as 3:2022cv02599
Plaintiff:
Tim Landholt
Defendant:
Richland County, South Carolina and Kendall Corley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Butler v. Richland County et al
as 8:2022cv02541
Plaintiff:
Lakeshia Butler
Defendant:
Richland County, Shane Kitchen, Mauricre Callahan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Scott v. Richland County
as 8:2022cv02031
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Gene Scott
Defendant:
Richland County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Drayton v. Richland, County of
as 3:2022cv01545
Plaintiff:
Marcus Drayton
Defendant:
Richland, County of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Disability Rights South Carolina v. Richland County
as 8:2022cv01358
Plaintiff:
Disability Rights South Carolina, A.C., J.H. and others
Defendant:
Richland County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Cromer v. Richland County et al
as 2:2022cv00663
Plaintiff:
Desmond Cromer
Defendant:
Richland County, Marcus A. Burnette, Signeous Green and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brown v. South Carolina, State of
as 3:2021cv03049
Plaintiff:
Orlando Ira Brown
Defendant:
South Carolina, State of and Richland County Sheriff's
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garcia v. Lott et al
as 3:2021cv02780
Plaintiff:
Jerome Garcia
Defendant:
SCDMV, Kevin Shwedo, Rob Bailes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gay v. Richland County, et al
as 3:2021cv02040
Plaintiff:
Sha'Quan Gay
Defendant:
Richland County and Columbia Police
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
