Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Bolden v. Richmond Police Department
as 3:2023cv03006
Plaintiff:
Amani Bolden
Defendant:
Richmond Police Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Bob v. Richmond Police Department
as 3:2023mc80160
Plaintiff:
Smith Bob
Defendant:
Richmond Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gentle v. Richmond Police Department
as 3:2022cv04076
Plaintiff:
Antoine Marquise Gentle
Defendant:
Richmond Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(PS) Gentle v. Richmond Police Department
as 2:2022cv00945
Plaintiff:
Antoine Marquise Gentle
Defendant:
Richmond Police Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Adams v. Richmond Police Department et al
as 4:2022cv00047
Plaintiff:
Henry Desean Adams
Defendant:
Richmond Police Department, Joshua Clark and C. Groge
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zeidan v. City of Richmond Police Department et al
as 3:2021cv04010
Defendant:
City of Richmond Police Department and Lt. Timothy Gard
Plaintiff:
Bashar Zeidan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv06926
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Romano v. Unknown Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Agents et al
as 3:2019cv07172
Defendant:
Unknown Richmond Police Department Officers, Unknown Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Agents, Richmond CA, Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas J. Romano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Montanocordoba v. Contra Costa County et al
as 4:2018cv05682
Defendant:
Richmond Police Department, Deputy T Jackson, Contra Costa County and others
Plaintiff:
Danesha Montanocordoba
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. Richmond Police Department
as 4:2018cv01557
Plaintiff:
Henry Desean Adams
Defendant:
Richmond Police Department, Ken Greco and Nichole Abetvko
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
