Cases 21 - 30 of 37
Williams v. Ridgeland Correctional Institution
as 1:2017cv02523
Plaintiff:
M. Williams
Defendant:
Ridgeland Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bradley v. Ridgeland Correctional Institution
as 1:2017cv02517
Plaintiff:
Isaac Bradley
Defendant:
Ridgeland Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Middleton v. Ridgeland Correctional Institution
as 1:2017cv02518
Plaintiff:
Tony Middleton
Defendant:
Ridgeland Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Singletary v. Warden Ridgeland Correctional Institution
as 0:2017cv02431
Petitioner:
Clifton Singletary
Respondent:
Warden Ridgeland Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Mast et al v. Ridgeland Correctional Institution
as 1:2017cv02038
Plaintiff:
Randy Mast, Thomas Caron, William Taylor and others
Defendant:
Ridgeland Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rhoden v. Ridgeland Correctional Institution
as 4:2017cv01044
Plaintiff:
Odis Rhoden
Defendant:
Ridgeland Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Wilson et al
as 4:2015cv03703
Petitioner:
Brian O'Neil Robinson
Respondent:
Warden Ridgeland Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Simmons v. The State of South Carolina et al
as 6:2014cv04803
Petitioner:
Cecil Allen Simmons
Respondent:
Warden of Ridgeland Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Richbert v. South Carolina Department of Corrections
as 4:2014cv03213
Petitioner:
Lazarus Demetrious Richbert
Respondent:
Warden Ridgeland Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Norris v. Warden of Ridgeland Correctional Institution
as 8:2013cv00913
Petitioner:
Michael D Norris
Respondent:
Warden of Ridgeland Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.