Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00232
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
RIGEL PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. v. ANNORA PHARMA PRIVATE LTD. et al
as 2:2022cv04732
Plaintiff:
RIGEL PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Counter Claimant:
ANNORA PHARMA PRIVATE LTD., HETERO LABS LTD. and HETERO USA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
RIGEL PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. v. ANNORA PHARMA PRIVATE LTD. et al
as 3:2022cv04732
Plaintiff:
RIGEL PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Defendant:
ANNORA PHARMA PRIVATE LTD., HETERO LABS LTD. and HETERO USA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation
as 3:2015cv04370
Plaintiff:
Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Defendant:
Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
Inter-Local Pension Fund GCC/I v. Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al
as 10-17619
:
In re: RIGEL PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellant:
INTER-LOCAL PENSION FUND GCC/IBT, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
RIGEL PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., JAMES M. GOWER, RYAN D. MAYNARD and others
RIGEL PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., v. KAPPOS
as 1:2009cv01914
Plaintiff:
RIGEL PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.,
Defendant:
DAVID J. KAPPOS
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
Shipway v. Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 3:2009cv00766
Plaintiff:
Rodney Shipway and Rodney Shipway
Defendant:
Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Inc., James M. Gower, Ryan D. Maynard and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Inter-Local Pension Fund GCC/IBT v. Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 3:2009cv00546
Plaintiff:
Inter-Local Pension Fund GCC/IBT, Inter-Local Pension Fund GCC/IBT, Inter-Local Pension Fund GCC/IBT and others
Defendant:
Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Inc., James M. Gower, Ryan D. Maynard and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.