Cases filed in the Tenth Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 569
Garcia v. Rios, et al
as 23-2200
Petitioner: LOUIS GARCIA
Respondent: HECTOR RIOS and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
Rice v. Does et al
as 1:2023cv01132
Plaintiff: Michelle Rios Rice
Defendant: John and/or Janes Does 1-5, Progressive Direct Insurance Company and Entities, Corporations, and Partnerships 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
Oakleaf v. Montes et al
as 2:2023cv01131
Plaintiff: Julie Marie Oakleaf
Defendant: FNU Montes and FNU Rios
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States v. Beltran-Del Rio
as 23-3261
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: JESUS AARON BELTRAN-DEL RIO
Bertolo (PS) v. Williams et al
as 1:2023cv02763
Defendant: Sean Burrows, Dean Williams, Andre Moses Stancil and others
Plaintiff: James M. Bertolo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02714
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Barbosa-Rios v. Garland
as 23-9584
Petitioner: IVAN BARBOSA-RIOS
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, United States Attorney General
Lucero v. Rios et al
as 2:2023cv00753
Petitioner: Jerry Lucero
Respondent: FNU Rios and New Mexico Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cuara R. v. Maverik Center et al
as 2:2023cv00576
Plaintiff: Constantino Cuara R.
Defendant: Maverik Center, Salt Palace Convention Center, Rio Tinto Stadium and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cuara R. v. Kennecott Rio Tinto et al
as 2:2023cv00546
Plaintiff: Constantino Cuara R.
Defendant: Kennecott Rio Tinto, Geneva Rock, Asphalt Materials and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?