Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Obannon v. Pichon et al
as 5:2017cv01700
Plaintiff:
Vincent Earl Obannon
Defendant:
Rise Jones Pichon, Jane Doe Pichon, Jeff Rosen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wade Robertson v. Rise Pichon, et al
as 15-16463
Petitioner - Appellant:
WADE ROBERTSON
Respondent - Appellee:
RISE JONES PICHON, Administrative Law Judge, Judge of Santa Clara Superior Court and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
James Adams v. City of San Jose, et al
as 14-16442
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES D. ADAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF SAN JOSE, SANTA CLARA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, RISE JONES PICHON, Administrative Law Judge, Judge and others
Maimon v. Ghezzi et al
as 3:2014cv00460
Plaintiff:
David Isaac Maimon
Defendant:
Michael Ghezzi, Palmer, Alexandria Gardner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. City of San Jose California
as 4:2012cv06276
Plaintiff:
James D. Adams
Defendant:
City of San Jose California, Santa Clara County Superior Court, Rise Jones Pichon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Angela Fan v. Judges of Superior Court, et al
as 11-15210
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANGELA FAN, AKA Yiqiang Fan
Defendant - Appellee:
JUDGES OF SUPERIOR COURT OF SANTA CLARA, CLERKS OF SUPERIOR COURT OF SANTA CLARA, CALIFORNIA WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD and others
Robertson v. Pichon et al
as 5:2010cv05027
Petitioner:
Wade Robertson
Respondent:
Rise Jones Pichon and Attorney General of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Fan v. Superior Court of Santa Clara County et al
as 5:2010cv00879
Defendant:
Superior Court of Santa Clara County, Judges of Superior Court of Santa Clara, Clerks of Superior Court of Santa Clara and others
Plaintiff:
Angela Fan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Anaya v. George et al
as 4:2008cv04178
Plaintiff:
Richard E. Anaya
Defendant:
Ronald M. George and Rise Jones Pichon
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
