Cases 81 - 90 of 138
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01020
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-3267
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Rite Aid of New York, Inc. v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
as 1:2013cv04137
Defendant:
Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Rite Aid of New York, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2013cv06119
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Naula et al v. Rite Aid of New York Inc et al
as 1:2012cv02602
Plaintiff:
Angel Naula and Jose Fermin
Defendant:
Rite AId of New York, Inc. , Does 1 through 100 and Rite Aid Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv09202
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv05069
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Hicks v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2012cv04363
Plaintiff:
Anthony Hicks
Defendant:
The City of New York, The New York City Police Department, McAloon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv02572
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Quinones et al v. Rite Aid Corporation et al
as 1:2012cv00870
Plaintiff:
Angel Quinones and Thomas Finley
Defendant:
Rite Aid Corporation, Eckerd Corporation, Rite AId of New York, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
