Cases 1 - 10 of 2,588
Rivera v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv01762
Plaintiff:
Yuleisy Klein Rivera
Defendant:
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Teva Women's Health, LLC, Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rivera-Garcia v. Neely et al
as 7:2024cv00256
Plaintiff:
Abigal Rivera-Garcia
Defendant:
Kimberly Neely and C Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Rivera v. Adiser Orlando, LLC
as 6:2024cv00359
Plaintiff:
Marieann Rivera
Defendant:
Adiser Orlando, LLC. and Adiser Orlando, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00187
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Aleman-Rivera v. United States of America
as 8:2024cv00916
Plaintiff:
Rafael Aleman-Rivera
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Rivera v. Perio Inc.
as 8:2024cv00371
Plaintiff:
Sal Rivera
Defendant:
Perio Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Bonilla-Rivera v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Manatee)
as 8:2024cv00799
Petitioner:
Miguel Bonilla-Rivera
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pritchett et al v. United Parcel Services Inc
as 2:2024cv00161
Plaintiff:
Cain Pritchett, Micheal Arnold, Bradley Barkley and others
Defendant:
United Parcel Services Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Island Vibes Kava, Inc.
as 9:2024cv80236
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Island Vibes Kava, Inc. d/b/a Island Vibes Kava Bar, David Branda, Ricardo J Rivera and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605 Unauthorized publication or use of communications
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
