Cases 21 - 30 of 39
Rivera v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2012cv02132
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Denise Rivera
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 g Review of Commissioner's Final Decision
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv02139
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act - Denial of Overtime Compensation
Nieto v. DeCamp
as 3:2012cv02115
Respondent:
Joe DeCamp
Petitioner:
Alfonso Rivera Nieto
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Flores v. City of Boardman et al
as 2:2012cv00087
Defendant:
City of Boardman and Frank Rivera
Plaintiff:
Manuel Flores, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Flores v. City of Boardman et al
as 3:2012cv00087
Defendant:
City of Boardman and Frank Rivera
Plaintiff:
Manuel Flores, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rivera v. State of Oregon et al
as 6:2011cv06270
Defendant:
Don A. Dickey, Farmers Insurance Company of Oregon, Hartford Group of Affiliated Insurance Company and others
Plaintiff:
Victorio C Rivera
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00732
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2011cv00675
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00675
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Limas-Rivera v. Mills
as 3:2010cv01416
Petitioner:
David Ubaldo Limas-Rivera
Respondent:
Don Mills
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
