Cases 1 - 10 of 196
Muqit v. ofc Rivera et al
as 0:2024cv00720
Plaintiff:
Yahya Muqit
Defendant:
ofc Rivera, Sgt Salazor, Sgt. Kimbrell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Lobo v. Warden B. Kendall et al
as 0:2023cv06050
Plaintiff:
Deniz Breadmore Lobo
Defendant:
Warden B. Kendall, Ofc. Rivera, Prison Guard #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Rivera v. Warden Kenneth Nelson
as 8:2023cv04801
Petitioner:
Kenneth Rivera, Kenneth D Rivera and Syncere Shabazz
Respondent:
Warden Kenneth Nelson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv02227
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Rivera v. Janson
as 4:2023cv01609
Petitioner:
Leonel Rivera
Respondent:
Warden Janson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Rivera v. Patterson et al
as 8:2023cv01107
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Rivera
Defendant:
Dennis Patterson, Stacey Richardson, Mr. Freddriks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Rivera v. Stirling et al
as 8:2022cv01994
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Rivera, Kenneth D. Rivera and Syncere Shabazz
Defendant:
Bryan P Stirling, Joel Anderson, Warden Nelson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Rivera v. Nelson
as 8:2021cv03492
Petitioner:
Kenneth Rivera
Respondent:
Warden Nelson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rivera v. Warden Broad River Correctional Inst.
as 8:2021cv02407
Petitioner:
Kenneth Syncere Rivera
Respondent:
Warden Broad River Correctional Inst.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rivera v. Loos et al
as 6:2021cv02017
Plaintiff:
Derrick Rivera
Defendant:
PFC Loos, Ofc Cox, Marcus D Rhodes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
