Cases 1 - 10 of 48
Aerotek, Inc. v. River Run Foods Inc
as 4:2024cv00804
Plaintiff:
Aerotek, Inc.
Defendant:
River Run Foods Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Hinshaw v. Moore et al
as 1:2024cv00769
Plaintiff:
Jason Dewight Hinshaw
Defendant:
Keri L. Moore, John Rivello, John Kohler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Banks v. Booher et al
as 1:2024cv00474
Plaintiff:
Marvin Banks, Running River, Dale Arnold and others
Defendant:
Superintendent Bradley Booher, Head Chaplain Henry Hansard, Tracy Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00988
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00291
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990
Custer et al v. Sigler et al
as 3:2022cv01675
Plaintiff:
Robin J. Custer and Mark A. Custer
Defendant:
Raymond G. Sigler and Two Rivers Grille, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Marsteller v. River Supply, Inc.
as 1:2022cv00546
Plaintiff:
Suzanne Marsteller
Defendant:
River Supply, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
United Specialty Insurance Company v. JB Trans et al
as 4:2021cv02092
Plaintiff:
United Specialty Insurance Company
Defendant:
JB Trans, Jaswant Singh, James R. Wolfe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Rivers v. Jamison
as 1:2021cv01409
Petitioner:
Virgil Rivers
Respondent:
J.L. Jamison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Murphy v. Dauphin County et al
as 1:2021cv01237
Plaintiff:
Holly Murphy
Defendant:
Dauphin County, River Drive Service Center, Inc., Shane Staley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
