Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Rivers v. King County Correctional Facility
as 3:2023cv05673
Plaintiff:
Stonney Marcus Rivers
Defendant:
King County, King County Correctional Facility, David Weirich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Warren v. State of Washington Attorney General et al
as 2:2019cv01413
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, State of Washington Attorney General, Kenneth Sawyer and others
Plaintiff:
Richard H Warren
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Neal v. Hood River County et al
as 1:2019cv03170
Defendant:
Alexisa James, John Sewell, Hood River County and others
Plaintiff:
Bret Neal and Bret Wyatt Neal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sonia v. Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2017cv00955
Plaintiff:
Brett Sonia
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Steve Hammond, MD, Karie Rainer, PsyD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maxwell v Plowman et al
as 2:2015cv00318
Plaintiff:
James H Maxwell
Defendant:
Adam Plowman, Gertrude Plowman and Black River Dairy Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dodge v. Monroe Correctional Complex - Twin Rivers Unit et al
as 2:2015cv00183
Plaintiff:
Michael Dodge
Defendant:
Monroe Correctional Complex - Twin Rivers Unit, Frank Busichio, Holly Delcombare and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Summers v. Clark County Jail et al
as 3:2013cv05484
Plaintiff:
Michael D Summers
Defendant:
Clark County Jail, Jackie Batties, Gary E Lucas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Twin River Correction Complex et al
as 2:2012cv01235
Plaintiff:
Princeton E Brown
Defendant:
Twin River Correction Complex, Sally Neiland, DOC Visitation Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dickerson v. Western Union Safeway Renton et al
as 2:2012cv01233
Plaintiff:
Bobby L. Dickerson, Jr.
Defendant:
Western Union Safeway Renton, Aladdin Bail Bonds, Liberty Bail Bonds and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
