Cases 1 - 10 of 11
West v. The GEO Group, Inc. et al
as 5:2018ct03230
Defendant:
Rivers Correctional Institution and The GEO Group, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Gary Emerson West
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Onley-Israel v. GEO/Rivers Correctional Institution et al
as 5:2016ct03008
Plaintiff:
Monwell Onley-Israel
Defendant:
GEO/Rivers Correctional Institution, Brick Tripp, Larry E. Whitman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Parker v. Rivers Correctional Institution et al
as 5:2015hc02093
Petitioner:
Tracy Parker
Respondent:
Rivers Correctional Institution and Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Lopez-Diaz v. Rivers Correctional Institution et al
as 5:2015hc02056
Petitioner:
Cesareo Lopez-Diaz
Respondent:
Rivers Correctional Institution and United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Cline v. G.E.O. Rivers Correctional Institution
as 5:2014ct03221
Plaintiff:
Raymond Cline
Defendant:
G.E.O. Rivers Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henry v. Rivers Correctional Institution
as 5:2014ct03172
Plaintiff:
Robert Henry
Defendant:
Rivers Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bowman v. United States of America et al
as 5:2013mc00032
Plaintiff:
Neal Bowman
Defendant:
United States of America, Brick Tripp, Rivers Correctional Institution and others
Young v. Holder, Jr. et al
as 5:2012hc02256
Petitioner:
Leonard Young
Respondent:
Eric Holder, Jr., Kevin Robbins, Bill Schvetta and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Young v. Holder, Jr. et al
as 5:2012mc00053
Plaintiff:
Leonard Young
Defendant:
Eric Holder, Jr., Kevin Robbins, Bill Schvetta and others
Scarborough v. District of Columbia et al
as 5:2012ct03181
Plaintiff:
Gregory Scarborough
Defendant:
District of Columbia, Federal Bureau of Prisons, The GEO Group, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
