Cases 1 - 10 of 53
ROACH v. EMMONS
as 5:2024cv00032
Plaintiff:
EARL ROACH
Defendant:
WARDEN SHAWN EMMONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roach v. Emmons
as 3:2023cv00247
Plaintiff:
Earl Roach
Defendant:
Warden Shawn Emmons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Conyers v. Chambers et al
as 3:2023cv00046
Plaintiff:
Richard Conyers
Defendant:
Warden Brian Chambers, Captain Scottie Roach, Mrs. Bragg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Womack v. Philbin et al
as 1:2023cv00051
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Womack
Defendant:
Warden Edwin Philbin, Ruthie Shelton, Dr. Alston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brewer v. Chambers et al
as 3:2023cv00007
Plaintiff:
Ms. Terry L. Brewer, Ms. Myia Brewer and Ms. Myia Lamonziyah Brewer
Defendant:
Warden Brian Chambers, Travis Prosser, Chabara Bragg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roach v. Liberty County Jail et al
as 4:2022cv00299
Plaintiff:
Nathan Avery Roach
Defendant:
Liberty County Jail, Captain McEady, Major Krumnow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boddie v. Palmer et al
as 6:2022cv00082
Plaintiff:
La'Shon Boddie
Defendant:
Officer CO II Jocilyn Palmer, Lieutenant Roach and Unit Manager Juanita Sharpe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00237
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
DAKER v. WARD et al
as 5:2022cv00343
Plaintiff:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD, AHMAD HOLT, CLAY NIX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daker v. Ward et al
as 6:2022cv00036
Plaintiff:
Waseem Daker
Defendant:
Timothy Ward, Jack Koon, Steve Upon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
