Cases 41 - 50 of 61
Roach v. General Motors LLC et al
as 3:2014cv00443
Plaintiff:
Rex Roach
Defendant:
General Motors LLC and Delphi Automotive PLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Roach v. Cook County Jail et al
as 1:2014cv02198
Plaintiff:
Thaddius Roach
Defendant:
Cook County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reeves et al v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation
as 3:2013cv00675
Plaintiff:
Charles Reeves , Ruby Reeves , William B. Reeves and others
Defendant:
SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Carwyle v. Anna Hospital Corporation et al
as 3:2013cv00371
Plaintiff:
Karen Carwyle
Defendant:
Anna Hospital Corporation and Ivy Roach
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Gear v. Grundy County, Illinois et al
as 1:2013cv02419
Plaintiff:
Steven Gear
Defendant:
Grundy County, Illinois , Coal City, Illinois , Darren Roach and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Rentfro et al v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2013cv02056
Plaintiff:
Daniel S Rentfro , Sherwin Savage , Robert Hendricks and others
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections, Michael Puisis, Louis Schicker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roach v. Willamson et al
as 1:2011cv07772
Plaintiff:
Bernard Roach
Defendant:
Dr. Willamson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roach et al v. City Of Chicago
as 1:2011cv06189
Plaintiff:
Duane Roach and Roger Sharkey
Defendant:
City Of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roach v. Bayer Corporation et al
as 3:2010cv20518
Plaintiff:
Brianne Roach
Defendant:
Bayer Corporation , Bayer Healthcare, LLC , Bayer Pharmaceuticals Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Roach v. Pierce et al
as 1:2010cv05352
Petitioner:
Duane Roach
Respondent:
Guy Pierce
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
