Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Edwards et al v. Egalite et al
as 2:2022cv00171
Plaintiff:
Mary Edwards and Brett Edwards
Defendant:
Edison Egalite and Roadway Movers, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co, LP v. Amick et al
as 1:2020cv00342
Plaintiff:
Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company, LP and Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co., LP
Defendant:
HPI Holdings, LTD, Teresa Amick, Approximately 1.09 Acres of Real Estate and an Adjacent Roadway in Grant County, Indiana and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Village of Sauk Village v. Roadway Express, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv09183
Plaintiff:
Village of Sauk Village
Defendant:
Roadway Express, Inc. , YRC Worldwide Inc , Arcadis U.S., Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00021
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv07644
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv03626
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Mack v. Roadway Package System Inc
as 1:2010cv00027
Plaintiff:
Earnest Mack
Defendant:
Roadway Package System Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv05870
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Bangaly v. Baggiani et al
as 1:2009cv02197
Plaintiff:
Sylla Bangaly
Defendant:
Alfred Baggiani, Roadway Express, Inc. and YRC Worldwide, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Roadway Express Inc v. LABR
as 09-1315
Petitioner:
ROADWAY EXPRESS, INCORPORATED
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Intervening Respondent:
PETER P. CEFALU
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
