Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Roane v. Warden Correctional Reception Center et al
as 2:2022cv02768
Plaintiff:
Terrance Roane
Defendant:
Warden Correctional Reception Center and Jonathon Mills
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roane v. Miller et al
as 4:2015cv01826
Plaintiff:
Terrance Roane
Defendant:
Laurie Miller, Jay Forshey and Institution Inspector Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roane v. LaRose et al
as 4:2014cv01779
Plaintiff:
Terrance Roane
Defendant:
Christopher J LaRose, Gary C Mohr and B. Rehgetti
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roane v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2011dp22088
Plaintiff:
Earl P Roane
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy, Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Roan v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2010dp20097
Plaintiff:
Robert Roan
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00915
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Roane v. City of Mansfield et al
as 1:2007cv01444
Plaintiff:
Don Roane
Defendant:
City of Mansfield, Lori Donaldson, John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States of America et al v. Industrial Excess Landfill, Inc. et al
as 5:1989cv01988
Plaintiff:
United States of America and State of Ohio, Ohio Attorney General
Defendant:
Industrial Excess Landfill, Inc. , B.F. Goodrich Company , Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc. and others
Cross_defendant:
Industrial Excess Landfill, Inc. , B.F. Goodrich Company , Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc. and others
3rd_party_plaintiff:
B.F. Goodrich Company , Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc. , Goodyear Aerospace Corporation and others
3rd_pty_defendant:
binet Craft Company, Dynamerican, Roan Aerial and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
