Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Daniel Rivera v. United States of America et al
as 2:2024cv01241
Plaintiff:
Daniel Rivera
Defendant:
United States of America, Roben Capili and Does 1 thru 25, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1402 Medical Malpractice
Roben Gaby Noujaim v. County of Riverside et al
as 5:2023cv02443
Petitioner:
Roben Gaby Noujaim
Defendant:
County of Riverside, Riverside County Sheriffs Office, County Chad Bianco and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00533
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01498
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv02068
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv08462
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv04746
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Mackenson v. Government Employees Insurance Company et al
as 3:2018cv01026
Defendant:
Government Employees Insurance Company, Does 1 to 20 and Government Employees Insurance Company doing business as GEICO
Plaintiff:
Jean-Baptiste Robens Mackenson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015cv02125
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Roben Noujaim v. City of Riverside et al
as 5:2014cv00702
Defendant:
Officer Genero Escobeo, Officer Louis Kerr, City of Riverside and others
Plaintiff:
Roben Noujaim
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
