Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Lewis et al v. RVJ Pizza Inc et al
as 5:2022cv00650
Plaintiff:
Jordan Lewis
Defendant:
RVJ Pizza Inc and Robert W Jones
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Nielsen v. Verano Holdings, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv00692
Defendant:
William Young, Chris Fotopoulos, Alan Bluestine and others
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Nielsen
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Jones v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2020cv00385
Plaintiff:
Robert J. Jones
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Jones et al v. United HealthCare Services Inc
as 5:2018cv00928
Defendant:
United HealthCare Services Inc
Plaintiff:
Robert C Jones and Joette L Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Kim v. BATS Global Markets, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv02817
Plaintiff:
Seung Kim
Defendant:
BATS Global Markets, Inc., Chris Concannon, Joseph Ratterman and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Jones v. Colvin
as 2:2016cv00261
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Jones
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405
Barnes, et al v. Harris, et al
as 14-4002
Plaintiff - Appellant:
J. CANUTE BARNES, W. KING BARNES and ROBERT V. JONES, derivatively on behalf of all similarly situated shareholders of, DBA Barnes Bancorporation
Defendant - Appellee:
CURTIS H. HARRIS, NED H. GILES, DAVID N. BARNES and others
Intervenor - Appellee:
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, as Receiver for, DBA Barnes Banking Corporation
Jones v. Taylor
as 5:2012cv01387
Petitioner:
Robert Charles Jones
Respondent:
Joseph L Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (state)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv02980
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Jones v. Taylor
as 11-6337
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROBERT CHARLES JONES
Respondent - Appellee:
JOSEPH L. TAYLOR, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
