Cases 31 - 40 of 41
NEAL v. OLIVER et al
as 2:2012cv00165
Respondent:
CHARLES LOCKET and JOHN C. OLIVER
Petitioner:
ROBERT DAVID NEAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
NEAL v. OLIVER et al
as 1:2012cv00791
Respondent:
CHARLES L. LOCKETT and JOHN C. OLIVER
Petitioner:
ROBERT DAVID NEAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
NEAL v. COLEMAN et al
as 2:2012cv00101
Defendant:
TERESER A. BANKS, F. TIMOTHY COLEMAN, CHRISTOPHER A. GREINER and others
Interested Party:
JO ANN BARNHART and LONNIE G. SCHMIDT
Plaintiff:
ROBERT DAVID NEAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
NEAL v. COLEMAN et al
as 2:2012cv00040
Defendant:
F TIMOTHY COLEMAN, JANE DOE, JOHN DOE and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT DAVID NEAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Neal et al v. Diez
as 1:2011cv07406
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Neal and Angela C. Cotton
Defendant:
Deborah A. Diez and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
NELSON v. LOCKETT
as 2:2011cv00209
Defendant:
CHARLES L. LOCKETT
Plaintiff:
ROBERT DAVID NEAL and DAVID J. NELSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NEAL v. BRIGGS
as 2:2011cv00184
Defendant:
LAURA A. BRIGGS
Plaintiff:
ROBERT DAVID NEAL and DAVID J. NELSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Todd v. MSI Credit Solutions LLC et al
as 1:2011cv02988
Plaintiff:
Michael Todd
Defendant:
MSI Credit Solutions LLC, Robert Adam Neal and Ricardo Mendiola
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
NELSON v. BRIGGS
as 1:2011cv00558
Respondent:
LAURA BRIGGS
Petitioner:
ROBERT DAVID NEAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Coram Nobis
NEAL v LOCKETT
as 1:2011cv00415
Respondent:
CHARLES L. LOCKETT
Plaintiff:
ROBERT DAVID NEAL
Petitioner:
DAVID J. NELSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
