Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Aaron et al v. Bow Plumbing Group, Inc.
as 2:2023cv00060
Plaintiff:
Marcus Aaron, Charles Age, Mary Frances Age and others
Defendant:
Bow Plumbing Group Inc. and Bow Plumbing Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Perry vs. Culliver, et al
as 1:2012cv00231
Plaintiff:
Wayne D. Perry
Defendant:
Grantt Culliver , Alabama Department of Corrections , Donny Myers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perry v. Culliver et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2012cv00154
Plaintiff:
Wayne D. Perry
Defendant:
Grantt Culliver , Alabama Department of Corrections , Donny Myers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. CMS Fountain Hospital et al
as 1:2010cv00029
Plaintiff:
Charles Calvin Moore
Defendant:
CMS Fountain Hospital, Delano Benjamin and Robert Barnes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allen v. Barnes
as 1:2009cv00838
Plaintiff:
Tracy G. Allen
Defendant:
Robert Barnes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allen v. Barnes
as 1:2009cv00137
Plaintiff:
Tracy Allen
Defendant:
Robert Barnes
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Reed v. Barnes et al
as 1:2008cv00420
Plaintiff:
Marshall Van Reed
Defendant:
Robert Barnes and Correctional Medical Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Riggins v. Barnes, et al
as 1:2008cv00157
Plaintiff:
Darryl Riggins
Defendant:
Robert Barnes, C. Stabler and Nurse Nabb
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Johnson v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2007cv00767
Plaintiff:
Re'Naul M. Johnson
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Richard Allen, Ron Canvanaugh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Allen et al
as 1:2007cv00278
Plaintiff:
Re'Naul M. Johnson
Defendant:
Richard Allen, Ron Canvanaugh, George Lyrene and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
