Cases 61 - 70 of 331
Grady v. Bentley et al
as 5:2014cv02374
Plaintiff:
Antwane Grady
Defendant:
Robert Bentley, Kim Tobias Thomas and Batina Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kiel v. Bentley et al
as 5:2014cv02380
Plaintiff:
John Fitzgerald Kiel
Defendant:
Robert Bentley, Kim Tobias Thomas and Batina Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dumas v. Bentley et al
as 5:2014cv02370
Plaintiff:
Travis Lowayne Dumas
Defendant:
Robert Bentley, Kim Tobias Thomas and Batina Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Radford v. Bentley et al
as 5:2014cv02372
Defendant:
Robert Bentley, Kim Tobias Thomas and Batina Carter
Plaintiff:
Antwone Radford
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ford v. Bentley et al
as 5:2014cv02367
Plaintiff:
Berry Lee Ford
Defendant:
Robert Bentley, Kim Tobias Thomas and Batina Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White v. Bentley et al
as 5:2014cv02368
Plaintiff:
John Douglas White
Defendant:
Robert Bentley, Kim Tobias Thomas and Batina Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lowrance v. Bentley et al
as 2:2014cv02316
Plaintiff:
Roger Deon Lowrance
Defendant:
Robert Bentley, Kim Tobias Thomas and Batina Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis et al v. Bentley et al
as 2:2014cv01045
Plaintiff:
Gary Davis Hart, II , Nathan D. Slaton , Kenneth Loggins and others
Defendant:
Robert Bentley, Luther Strange, Kim Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ferguson et al v. Thomas et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2014cv01012
Plaintiff:
Cecil M. Ferguson and William W. Horsman, III
Defendant:
Kim Tobias Thomas , Alabama Dept of Corrections , Dewayne Estes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stout v. Amerson et al
as 1:2014cv01862
Plaintiff:
Everett Leon Stout
Defendant:
Larry Amerson, Brian McVeigh, Leon Smith and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
