Cases 21 - 28 of 28
Charles Mayfield v. Richard Miles, et al
as 15-1278
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES MAYFIELD
Defendant - Appellee:
RICHARD MILES, Dr., DEBRA L. SCUTT, Warden, Warden, KEFF, Physician's Assistant and others
Mayfield v. Miles et al
as 1:2013cv10341
Plaintiff:
Charles Mayfield
Defendant:
Richard Miles, Debra Scutt, Keff and others
John Jones, Jr. v. Michael Staples, et al
as 12-2204
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN DOUGLAS JONES, JR.
Defendant:
MICHAEL STAPLES, Michigan Parole Board, in his official and personal capacities, MICHAEL ADDICOTT, Detective, Muskegon Police Department, in his official and personal capacities, DEBRA SCUTT, Warden, Warden, G. Roberts Cotton Correctional Facility, in her official and personal capacities and others
Quicksilver, Inc. v. Sonic Impact Technologies, LLC et al
as 3:2010cv01354
Plaintiff:
Quicksilver, Inc.
Defendant:
Sonic Impact Technologies, LLC, Mark Zickel, Richard Bracke and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Knauff et al v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.
as 4:2009cv02377
Plaintiff:
James Knauff, III, Aaron Williams, Jason Reech and others
Defendant:
Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Karlos Harris v. G. Robert Cotton Correctional, et al
as 09-1547
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KARLOS HARRIS
Defendant - Appellee:
G. ROBERT COTTON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and PARSONS, Sergeant
Lonner Melton v. Michigan Corrections Commissio, et al
as 09-1407
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LONNER MELTON
Defendant:
MICHIGAN CORRECTIONS COMMISSION
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, PATRICIA CARUSO, Warden, Director, Department of Corrections, DOUGLAS VASBINDER, Warden, Warden of G. Robert Cotten Correctional Facility and others
Harris v. G Robert Cotton Correctional Facility et al
as 2:2009cv11006
Plaintiff:
Karlos Harris
Defendant:
G Robert Cotton Correctional Facility and Parsons
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
