Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Kapordelis v. Brant
as 11-280
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Gregory C. Kapordelis, As individual and as owner of Kapordelis Management Systems, Inc.
Defendant - Appellee:
Cory Brant, Mr. Jerome Coleman, Robert Fitzsimmons and others
Kapordelis v. Brant et al
as 1:2010cv04900
Defendant:
Rodman Carl Bergstrom, Cory Brant, Mr. Jerome Coleman and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory C. Kapordelis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Campbell v. Crum et al
as 8:2010cv01880
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Campbell, Jr
Defendant:
Molly Crum, Gwenblyne Young Smalls, Robert Fitzsimmons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Campbell v. Fitzsimmons et al
as 8:2010cv00910
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Campbell, Jr
Defendant:
Robert Fitzsimmons, Jarrett Douglas, Charles Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Campbell v. Fitzsimmons et al
as 8:2010cv00092
Defendant:
Robert Fitzsimmons, Jarrett Douglas, Charles Gonzales and others
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Campbell, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Kapordelis v. Danzig et al
as 1:2009cv04019
Plaintiff:
Gregory C. Kapordelis
Defendant:
Aaron M. Danzig, William L. McKinnon, Robert C. McBurney and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Campbell v. Fitzsimmons et al
as 8:2009cv02249
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Campbell, Jr
Defendant:
Robert Fitzsimmons, Jarrett Douglas, Charles Gonzales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Campbell v. McIlwain et al
as 8:2009cv01156
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Campbell, Jr
Defendant:
Barbara McIlwain, Charles Gonzalez, Jarrett Douglas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Campbell v. Fitzsimmons et al
as 8:2008cv03805
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Campbell, Jr
Defendant:
Robert Fitzsimmons, Jarrett Douglas, Charles Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
