Cases 31 - 40 of 112
USA v. Roberto Hernandez-Rodriguez
as 11-10230
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ROBERTO HERNANDEZ-RODRIGUEZ, AKA Felipe Hernandez-Rodriguez, AKA Robert Hernandez-Rodriguez
Richard Stephen Levy v. James Tilton et al
as 2:2008cv02972
Respondent:
Calif. Board of Parole Hearings, Calif. Dept. of Corr. & Rehab, Robert Hernandez and others
Petitioner:
Richard Stephen Levy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Diparra v. Bennet et al
as 3:2010cv02454
Plaintiff:
Jose Luis Diparra
Defendant:
Bennet, ., Matthew Cate, Thomas Hoffman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. Hernandez
as 3:2010cv01807
Petitioner:
Eric W Young
Respondent:
Robert Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
National Union of Healthcare Workers et al v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan Inc. et al
as 3:2010cv03686
Defendant:
Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Kaiser Foundation Health Plan Inc., The Permanente Medical Group, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Danielle Estrada, Angela Glasper, National Union of Healthcare Workers and others
Not Classified By Court:
SEIU United Healthcare Workers-West ("UHW-W")
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Curtis Hawkins v. Robert Hernandez
as 10-55818
Petitioner - Appellant:
CURTIS CAMERON HAWKINS
Respondent - Appellee:
ROBERT HERNANDEZ, Warden
Pittman v. Sanchez et al
as 3:2010cv01085
Plaintiff:
Wilbur Lann Pittman
Defendant:
A Sanchez, Robert Hernandez, . and Jary Sandor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pittman v. Espino et al
as 3:2010cv00908
Plaintiff:
Wilbur Lann Pittman
Defendant:
Espino, V Aguirrie, White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pittman v. Attorney General et al
as 3:2010cv00629
Plaintiff:
Wilbur Lann Pittman
Defendant:
Attorney General, V Aguirrie and Robert Hernandez, .
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
