Cases 41 - 50 of 193
Rogers v. Horel
as 3:2010cv01439
Petitioner:
John D. Rogers
Respondent:
Robert Horel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Joseph Jackson v. James A. Yate
as 10-15708
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOSEPH JACKSON
Respondent - Appellee:
ROBERT HOREL, Warden
Theodore Blackmon v. Robert Horel
as 10-15515
Petitioner - Appellant:
THEODORE BLACKMON
Respondent - Appellee:
ROBERT HOREL, Warden
Sergio Alvarez v. Robert Horel, et al
as 10-15527
Petitioner - Appellant:
SERGIO ALVAREZ
Respondent - Appellee:
ROBERT HOREL, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Madrid, et al v. Dept Of Corrections, et al
as 3:1990cv03094
Plaintiff:
Alejandro Madrid , Ronnie Dewberry, Carlos Lutz and others
Defendant:
James Rowland, Charles D. Marshall, T. K. Boyll and others
Intervenor:
Gregory Eugene Shock and California Correctional Peace Officers Association
Amicu:
Amici Curiae
Pecial_master:
John Hagar
3rd_party_defendant:
Paul M. Starkey
Miscellaneou:
Office of the Inspector General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jorge Garcia v. Robert Horel, et al
as 10-15262
Petitioner - Appellant:
JORGE GARCIA
Respondent - Appellee:
ROBERT HOREL, Warden and PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
England v. Horel et al
as 3:2010cv00153
Plaintiff:
Robert England
Defendant:
Robert Horel, Francisco Taquez, Michael Sayre and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Danny Troxell v. Richard Kirkland, et al
as 10-15028
Petitioner - Appellant:
DANNY TROXELL
Respondent - Appellee:
RICHARD KIRKLAND, ROBERT HOREL, BOARD OF PRISON HEARINGS and others
Perkins v. Chrones et al
as 4:2009cv05855
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Donell Perkins
Defendant:
L. Chrones, Robert Horel, Francisco Jacquez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sergio Alvarez v. Robert Horel
as 09-17755
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SERGIO ALVAREZ
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT HOREL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
