Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Tyson v. Johnson et al
as 4:2022cv00096
Petitioner:
James Charles Tyson, Sr.
Respondent:
Robert Johnson and Scott County District Court
Interested Party:
Kevin Cmelik
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Botts v. West et al
as 3:2021cv03023
Plaintiff:
Larry Botts
Defendant:
Shelly Marie West, Kris Weitzell, Robert Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Botts v. West et al
as 1:2021cv00071
Plaintiff:
Larry Eugene Botts
Defendant:
Shelly Marie West, Kris Weitzell, Warden Robert Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hassan v. Fort Dodge Correctional Facility
as 1:2020cv00083
Respondent:
Robert Johnson
Petitioner:
Dhuuh Mohamed Hassan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Matthews v. Johnson
as 3:2020cv03029
Petitioner:
Jerry Ray Matthews
Respondent:
Robert Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Brooks v. Johnson
as 3:2019cv03006
Defendant:
Robert Johnson
Plaintiff:
Lance C Brooks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Johnson v. Barrett et al
as 4:2019cv00031
Defendant:
Polk County, Jannet Barrett, State of Iowa and others
Interested Party:
William A Hill
Plaintiff:
Tommy Lee Johnson and Inger Denise Hall-Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brothern v. Iowa Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2018cv03037
Plaintiff:
Anthony Brothern
Defendant:
Iowa Department of Corrections, Joshua McNeil, Michael DeWolf and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cooper v. Iowa Dept of Corrections et al
as 3:2018cv03020
Petitioner:
Raymond Dean Boyd Cooper
Respondent:
Iowa Dept of Corrections, Attorney General, State Of Iowa and Robert Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Liebing et al v. Sand et al
as 1:2017cv00142
Plaintiff:
Roger Liebing , Gary McCool , Alan Lucas and others
Defendant:
Robert Sand , Kevin Cmelik , Tom J Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
