Cases 61 - 70 of 78
Johnson v. Reid et al
as 1:2009cv03626
Plaintiff:
Robert Johnson
Defendant:
Reid, Dixon and Manning
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Bloomberg et al
as 1:2009cv02454
Plaintiff:
Robert Johnson
Defendant:
Michael Bloomberg, Jonathan Mintz and Thomas Frieden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv01959
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Bruce et al v. New York City et al
as 1:2008cv04512
Plaintiff:
Terrance Bruce, Julius Goodwin, Michael Mitchell and others
Defendant:
New York City, Robert Johnson and John Doe
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Johnson v. Denicola et al
as 1:2008cv09307
Plaintiff:
Robert Johnson
Defendant:
Frank Denicola, Glasnapp Dariusz, Stewart and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Securities And Exchange Commission v. Durant et al
as 1:2008cv01539
Plaintiff:
Securities And Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Robert Durant, Robert Johnson, Tyde, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Rivera v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2008cv00212
Plaintiff:
Christopher Rivera
Defendant:
The City of New York, Raymond Kelly, Robert Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jordan v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2008cv00132
Plaintiff:
Shirley Jordan
Defendant:
The City of New York, Raymond W. Kelly, Robert Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ricks v. Doe et al
as 1:2007cv09849
Plaintiff:
James Ricks
Defendant:
John Doe, John Doe, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Smith et al
as 6:2007cv06413
Plaintiff:
Robert Johnson
Defendant:
Janice Smith, Melvin L. Williams and Officer John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
