Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Lindblad v. Gas, et al.
as 24-1983
Plaintiff:
ROBERT LINDBLAD
Defendant:
LINDE GAS, STEVEN ANGEL and SANJIV LAMBA
Lindblad v. Linde AG et al
as 3:2023cv06179
Plaintiff:
Robert Lindblad
Defendant:
Linde AG, Officer Steven Angel and Sanjiv Lamba
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Conversion
Lindblad v. Lunny et al
as 4:2022cv04777
Plaintiff:
Robert Lindblad
Defendant:
Lieutenant Lunny and Mateo County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(PS) Lindblad v. Lunny et al
as 2:2022cv01424
Plaintiff:
Robert Lindblad
Defendant:
Lunny and Mateo County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lindblad v. United States Government
as 4:2021cv05705
Plaintiff:
Robert M. Lindblad and Robert Lindblad
Defendant:
United States Government, United States Attorney's Office, Civil Process Clerk, Senator Lindsey Graham and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Robert Lindblad v. Kandis Westmore, et al
as 21-16820
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT LINDBLAD
Defendant / Appellee:
KANDIS A. WESTMORE, JON S. TIGAR, LAUREL D. BEELER and others
Robert Lindblad v. Department of Defense, et al
as 21-16926
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT LINDBLAD
Defendant / Appellee:
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY and others
Lindblad v. Han Lin Auction Gallery et al
as 3:2021cv07548
Plaintiff:
Robert Lindblad
Defendant:
Han Lin Auction Gallery, Chien Lung Antiques and Think Tank Learning
Lindblad v. Walgreens Corporations et al
as 3:2021cv07507
Plaintiff:
Robert Lindblad
Defendant:
Walgreens Corporations, Starbucks Coffee and Arapahoe County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lindblad v. Westmore et al
as 3:2021cv07814
Plaintiff:
Robert Lindblad
Defendant:
Kandis A. Westmore, District Court Judge Jon S. Tigar, Laurel Beeler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
