Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv01263
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00647
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Pat Quinn v. Robert Gates
as 08-2767
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROD R. BLAGOJEVICH and PAT QUINN, Governor of Illinois
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT M. GATES, Secretary of Defense, United States Department of Defense, ANTHONY J. PRINCIPI, JAMES H. BILBRAY and others
Rod Blagojevich v. Robert Gates, et al
as 08-2427
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROD R. BLAGOJEVICH
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT M. GATES, Secretary of Defense of the United States, ANTHONY J. PRINCIPI, Chairman of the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Commission, JAMES H. BILBRAY and others
Kelly Ofoma v. Department of Defense, et al
as 08-1589
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KELLY J. OFOMA
Defendant - Appellee:
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF DEFENSE, ROBERT M. GATES, Secretary of Defense, United States Department of Defense and others
Ofoma v. The Department of Defense et al
as 1:2008cv00411
Plaintiff:
Kelly J. Ofoma
Defendant:
The Department of Defense, Assistant Secretary of Defense, Robert M. Gates and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00003
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
THE SIERRA CLUB et al VS GATES ET AL
as 2:2007cv00101
Plaintiff:
THE SIERRA CLUB, THE SIERRA CLUB, THE CHEMICAL WEAPONS WORKING GROUP and others
Defendant:
ROBERT M GATES, SECRETARY OF DEFENSE, PETE GREEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901 Resource & Recovery Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
