Cases 51 - 60 of 68
Langa v. Houston et al
as 8:2010cv00229
Respondent:
Robert P. Houston, Nebraska Board of Pardons and Nebraska Board of Parole
Petitioner:
Wopashitwe Mondo Eyen We Langa
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Boyer v. Rajagopol et al
as 4:2010cv03100
Defendant:
Kathleen Blum, Wayne Chandler, Dr. Glen Christianson and others
Plaintiff:
William Robert Boyer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robert Sanford v. NE Dept of Correction Services, et al
as 10-2141
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Robert E. Sanford
Defendant - Appellee:
Nebraska Department of Correctional Services, Robert P. Houston, Director of Correctional Services, Fred Britten, Warden at the Tecumseh State Corr. Inst. and others
McKinney v. Houston et al
as 8:2010cv00135
Respondent:
John J. Dahm and Robert P. Houston
Petitioner:
Lora McKinney
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Dickey et al
as 4:2010cv03043
Defendant:
Dennis Bakewell, Dr. Casebolt, Dickey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bernard Long v. Robert Houston, et al
as 10-1365
Petitioner - Appellant:
Bernard D. Long
Respondent - Appellee:
Robert P. Houston, Dir. N.D.C.S. and State of Nebraska
Michael Hernandez v. Robert Houston, et al
as 10-1246
Petitioner - Appellant:
Michael Anton Hernandez
Respondent - Appellee:
Robert P. Houston, Director and Fred Britten, Warden T.S.C.I.
Gene Shannon v. Robert Houston
as 09-3532
Petitioner - Appellant:
Gene Shannon
Respondent - Appellee:
Robert P. Houston
Hernandez v. Houston et al
as 4:2009cv03070
Petitioner:
Michael Anton Hernandez
Respondent:
Robert P. Houston and Fred Britten
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Long v. Houston et al
as 4:2009cv03046
Petitioner:
Bernard D. Long
Respondent:
Robert P. Houston and State of Nebraska
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
