Cases 91 - 100 of 129
O. v. Keisler et al
as 4:2007cv03411
Plaintiff:
Sewon O.
Defendant:
Peter D Keisler, Michael Chertoff, Emilio T Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Arid v Chertoff
as 4:2007mc00609
Petitioner:
Sami Arid
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Emilio T Gonzalez, Sharon A Hudson and others
Contreras-Castro v. Keisler et al
as 4:2007mc00602
Plaintiff:
Roberto Contreras-Castro
Defendant:
Peter D. Keisler, Robert S Mueller, III, Michael Chertoff and others
Rashid v Chertoff
as 4:2007mc00605
Petitioner:
Omar Sharif Rashid
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Emilio T Gonzalez, Sharon A Hudson and others
Sorkhi v Chertoff
as 4:2007mc00597
Petitioner:
Soheila Sorkhi
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Emilio T Gonzalez, Sharon A Hudson and others
Qin v. Mueller, et al
as 4:2007cv00433
Petitioner:
Xiaozhen Qin
Defendant:
Robert S Mueller, III and Emilio T Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Booker vs Alberto Gonzales, et al.
as 4:2007cv02914
Plaintiff:
Laura Booker
Defendant:
US Attorney General, Robert S. Mueller, III, Robert S. Mueller, III and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 7703 Discrimination - Review of Agency Act
Garrido et al v. Mueller et al
as 3:2007cv01502
Plaintiff:
Sergio Garrido and Sandra Selene Millan
Defendant:
Robert S Mueller, III, Michael Chertoff and David Roark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Vemuri v. Gonzales et al
as 3:2007cv01479
Plaintiff:
Arun Tej Vemuri
Defendant:
Alberto R Gonzales, Michael Chertoff, Emilio T Gonzales and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Guo v. Chertoff et al
as 4:2007cv00344
Plaintiff:
Jason Chon Guo
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Emilio T Gonzalez, Angela Barrows and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
