Cases 81 - 90 of 208
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00896
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
KANNAN v. CLEMENT et al
as 2:2008cv00745
Petitioner:
MAHMOUD S. KANNAN
Respondent:
PAUL CLEMENT, MICHAEL CHERTOFF, THE UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES ("USCIS") and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
KALNINS v. MUKASEY et al
as 2:2008cv00747
Plaintiff:
GIRTS KALNINS
Defendant:
MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, MICHAEL CHERTOFF, EMILIO T. GONZALEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
REHMAN v. MUKASEY et al
as 2:2008cv00702
Plaintiff:
ABDUR REHMAN
Defendant:
MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, MICHAEL CHERTOFF, EMILIO T. GONZALEZ and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00080
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00074
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
LIAKHOVITSKI v. MUELLER et al
as 2:2008cv00422
Plaintiff:
DANIEL LIAKHOVITSKI
Defendant:
ROBERT S. MUELLER, III, MICHAEL CHERTOFF, EMILIO T. GONZALEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1158 Immigration & Nationality Act, Section 208
LU v. CHERTOFF et al
as 2:2008cv00097
Plaintiff:
GANWEI LU
Defendant:
MICHAEL CHERTOFF, EMILIO T. GONZALEZ, EVELYN UPCHURCH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00425
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
LU v. CHERTOFF et al
as 2:2008cv00281
Plaintiff:
CANGHAI LU
Defendant:
MICHAEL CHERTOFF, EMILIO T. GONZALEZ, EVELYN UPCHURCH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
