Cases 1 - 10 of 10
WASHINGTON v. SOUTH WOODS STATE PRISON et al
as 1:2023cv23179
Plaintiff:
ROBERT SCOTT SMITH WASHINGTON, JR.
Defendant:
SOUTH WOODS STATE PRISON, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ANTHONY DEGNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robert Scott v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, et al
as 23-2974
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT SCOTT
Defendant / Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA
WASHINGTON v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 1:2023cv16631
Plaintiff:
ROBERT SCOTT SMITH WASHINGTON, JR.
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, ELLEN E. LOUGHNEY, ERIC R. SHENKUS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SCOTT v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2020cv03497
Petitioner:
ROBERT SCOTT
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Scott v. USA
as 1:2016cv01364
Petitioner:
Robert Scott, Sr.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
USA v. Robert Scott, Sr.
as 15-3126
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ROBERT SCOTT, SR., a/k/a Big Rob
Robert Scott v. Superintendent Mercer SCI, et al
as 14-4560
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT SCOTT
Defendant - Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT MERCER SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY NORTHAMPTON COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Fadden v. Rozum
as 3:2013cv01728
Petitioner:
Robert Scott Fadden
Respondent:
Gerald Rozum and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Scott v. USA
as 1:2012cv02095
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Robert Scott, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
SCOTT et al v. THOMPSON et al
as 5:2011cv03282
Petitioner:
ROBERT SCOTT
Respondent:
BRIAN THOMPSON, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF NORTHAMPTON and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
