Cases 1 - 10 of 45
Bradley et al v. Timco Logistics Systems, LLC
as 3:2023cv00194
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Bradley, Edgar Crespo, Mohi Fogaha and others
Defendant:
Timco Logistics Systems, LLC
Smith v. Keith Mosing Automotive Enterprises, LLC
as 4:2022cv02737
Plaintiff:
Robert Smith
Defendant:
Keith Mosing Automotive Enterprises, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Smith v. Allstate Texas Lloyd's
as 4:2019cv04970
Plaintiff:
Robert Smith
Defendant:
ALLSTATE TEXAS LLOYD'S
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2019cv00079
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Hicks v. Davis et al
as 3:2019cv00261
Defendant:
Director of TDCJ CID Lorie Davis, Lieutenant Ahmed Aboulmalik, Sargeant Robert Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Hicks, Don Overton, Eddie Law and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith et al v. EPSI, INC.
as 6:2019cv00124
Plaintiff:
Robert Smith and Louis Grooms, Jr.
Defendant:
EPSI, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 203
Smith v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
as 5:2019cv00064
Respondent:
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Petitioner:
James Robert Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Smith v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
as 3:2019cv00798
Respondent:
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Petitioner:
James Robert Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's v. Jose M. Gracias d/b/a KE Construction a/k/a Jose M. Gracias d/b/a/ K.E. Construction et al
as 4:2019cv00557
Plaintiff:
Policy Number ART423 Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's
Defendant:
Denis Jesus Garcia Fuentes, Robert Smith Commonhouse Construction and Jose M. Gracias d/b/a KE Construction a/k/a Jose M. Gracias d/b/a/ K.E. Construction
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00370
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
