Cases 41 - 50 of 86
Robert Irvin v. Todd Campbell, et al
as 14-5396
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT THOMAS IRVIN
Defendant - Appellee:
TODD J. CAMPBELL, U.S. District Judge, JOE B. BROWN, U.S. Magistrate Judge, ROBERT L. ECHOLS, U.S. District Judge and others
Robert Thomas v. Oregon State Police, et al
as 14-35229
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT THOMAS
Defendant - Appellee:
OREGON STATE POLICE, SCOTT VAUGHN and TODD BURKE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01332
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112
Irvin v. Campbell et al
as 3:2014cv00360
Plaintiff:
Robert Thomas Irvin
Defendant:
Todd J. Campbell, Joe B. Brown, Robert L. Echols and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00354
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
McDonald v. Zions First National Bank, N.A. et al
as 1:2013cv03293
Plaintiff:
R. Kirk McDonald
Defendant:
Zions First National Bank, N.A., Diane Hartz Warsoff, Bloom Murr Accomazzo & Siler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
The State of Tennessee, et al v. Robert Irvin
as 13-6421
Plaintiff - Appellee:
THE STATE OF TENNESSEE, MONTGOMERY COUNTY, TENNESSEE, CITY OF CLARKSVILLE, TENNESSEE and others
Defendant - Appellant:
ROBERT THOMAS IRVIN
The State of Tennessee et al v. Irvin
as 3:2013cv00995
Plaintiff:
The State of Tennessee, Montgomery County, Tennessee, The City of Clarksville and others
Defendant:
Robert Thomas Irvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Irvin v. The City of Clarksville Police Dept. et al
as 3:2013cv00994
Plaintiff:
Robert Thomas Irvin
Defendant:
S. Walden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Hudak et al
as 1:2013cv05684
Plaintiff:
Robert Thomas
Defendant:
Matthew Hudak, Terrance O'Brien, John Cichy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
