Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Garcia v. SCDPS et al
as 3:2024cv00038
Plaintiff:
Jerome Garcia
Defendant:
SCDPS, Trooper Wayne Davidson, South Carolina Public Safety and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Jacobus et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv05823
Plaintiff:
Jason Tyler Jacobus, Honeybird Organic Farm, LLC, Dennis Leveris and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, AGC Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Teal v. Woods et al
as 3:2022cv03879
Plaintiff:
James Teal
Defendant:
South Carolina Dep't of Public Safty, Director Robert Woods, Officer G. E. Littles and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Reaves v. Davidson et al
as 4:2022cv01142
Plaintiff:
Kathy J. Reaves and Kathy Juanita Reaves
Defendant:
William H. Davidson, II, Davidson, Wren & DeMasters, P.A., South Carolina Div. of Motor Vehicles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Reaves v. Wilkerson et al
as 4:2022cv01077
Plaintiff:
Kathy Reaves and Kathy Juanita Reaves
Defendant:
Scott Wilkerson, Regina Crolley, Mark Keel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sanchez et al v. 3M Company (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Co) et al
as 2:2022cv00029
Defendant:
3M Company, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Benjamin P Sanchez, Roger Scharmen, Tamela Schmidt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Bryan v. F.B.I. et al
as 1:2010cv02554
Plaintiff:
T. Terell Bryan
Defendant:
F.B.I., S.L.E.D., U.S. Attorney (S.C.) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith et al v. Washington Mutual Bank FA et al
as 2:2008cv02573
Plaintiff:
Wesley Edward Smith, III and Leshell D Smith
Defendant:
Washington Mutual Bank FA, CTX Mortgage Corporation LLC, Centex Homes Inc and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
