Cases 1 - 10 of 55
Perez v. Rayford et al
as 9:2024cv00040
Plaintiff:
Roberto Perez
Defendant:
J Rayford, J Hamilton, M McGhee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perez v. Lumpkin et al
as 4:2023cv02083
Plaintiff:
Roberto Perez
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin, Sergio Perez and S. Easter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perez v. Perez et al
as 9:2023cv00052
Defendant:
Sergio J Perez, Sergio J. Perez and Heather Glover
Plaintiff:
Roberto Perez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perez v. Perez et al
as 1:2023cv00274
Defendant:
Sergio J. Perez, Sergio J. Perez, Jr. and Heather Glover
Plaintiff:
Roberto Perez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perez v. Fernandez et al
as 1:2023cv00200
Defendant:
Sergio J. Perez, Enrique Fernandez, The State of Texas 63rd Judicial District Court and others
Plaintiff:
Roberto Perez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perez v. Fernandez et al
as 1:2022cv00310
Plaintiff:
Roberto Perez
Defendant:
Enrique Fernandez, Michael Bagley, Gary A Villarreal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perez v. Glover et al
as 9:2022cv00080
Plaintiff:
Roberto Perez
Defendant:
Heather Glover, CO III Unknown Perez, Unknown Sells and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Perez v. Lumpkin et al
as 1:2022cv00123
Plaintiff:
Roberto Perez
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin, Matthew Steel, Cody McGallion and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perez v. Lumpkin et al
as 9:2022cv00052
Plaintiff:
Roberto Perez
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin, Matthew Steel, Cody McGallion and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perez v. Hanson et al
as 9:2022cv00050
Plaintiff:
Roberto Perez
Defendant:
Janice Hanson and Keath Dulenon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
