Cases 1 - 10 of 96
Noyola v. Palacios Gomez et al
as 4:2024cv04910
Defendant:
Roberto Ramirez Gonzalez and Jose V Palacios Gomez
Plaintiff:
Michael I Noyola
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv07916
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv02005
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
United States of America v. Olivo (Sanchez)
as 24-2151
Defendant:
ELIMANUEL DIAZ, PEDRO OLIVO, WILLIE TUCKER and others
:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Olivo (Martinez)
as 24-1699
Defendant:
PEDRO OLIVO, JOAQUIN CASTILLO, MICHAEL MARTINEZ and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Ontiveros Molina v. Eagle Steel LLC et al
as 1:2024cv01476
Defendant:
Hortencia Ramirez, Eagle Steel LLC and Roberto Ramirez
Plaintiff:
Erick Ontiveros Molina
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Carrillo-Lopez de Ramirez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-224
Petitioner:
BRENDA CAROLINA CARRILLO-LOPEZ DE RAMIREZ, ELIAS ROBERTO RAMIREZ-CARRILLO and CARLOS EUSATQUIO RAMIREZ-CARRILLO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
United States of America v. Juarez (Juan Roberto Ramirez)
as 22-2065
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Claudia Juarez, Omar Juarez Andrade, AKA Negro, Tomas Anzaldua, AKA Tommy and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Juan Roberto Ramirez, Jr.
Ramirez Cruz v. Garland
as 22-1376
Petitioner:
ROBERTO RAMIREZ CRUZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Ramirez v. Garland
as 22-1157
Petitioner:
ROBERTO RAMIREZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
