Cases 41 - 50 of 61
Hayes et al v. Chevron Pipe Line Company
as 2:2012cv00287
Plaintiff:
Peter Hayes , Thi-Ly Downing-Hays , George Eugene Barton and others
Defendant:
Chevron Pipe Line Company and PacifiCorp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Liberona et al v. I Scoppiati, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00394
Plaintiff:
Marcello Liberona , Kenneth Robison , Sandro Torres and others
Defendant:
I Scoppiati, Inc., Imatti Ristorante, Inc. and Giba, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
SAC Acquisition v. Reliance International et al
as 2:2011cv00959
Plaintiff:
SAC Acquisition
Defendant:
Reliance International, Zermod and Robison Furniture
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Abbott v. Sprint Nextel Corporation et al
as 2:2011cv02572
Plaintiff:
Jesse F. Yarger, Frances Junann Smith, Miriam F. Jeralds and others
Defendant:
Sprint Communications, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Hitachi Capital America Corp v. Shiloh Imaging Center LLC et al
as 5:2011cv01126
Plaintiff:
Hitachi Capital America Corp
Defendant:
Shiloh Imaging Center LLC, Diagnostic Medical Imaging Consultants LLC, Larry Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00274
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Mas et al v. Gomez-Garcia
as 2:2011cv00281
Plaintiff:
Juana Vicario Mas , Marta Ordonez Raxuleu and Daniel R. Robison
Defendant:
Jose Gomez-Garcia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00056
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00057
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Brock, et al v. Herbert, et al
as 10-4159
Plaintiff - Appellee:
HENRY S. BROCK and JAY RICE
Defendant - Appellant:
GARY HERBERT, MARK L. SHURTLEFF, FRANCINE A. GIANI, in thier official and individual capacities and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
