Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Rock v. State of Georgia
as 6:2022cv00076
Petitioner:
Gregory Levon Rock
Respondent:
State of Georgia and Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rock v. State of Georgia
as 1:2022cv03597
Petitioner:
Gregory Levon Rock
Respondent:
State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rochester v. Trump et al
as 1:2020cv01706
Petitioner:
Julian E. Rochester and J-Rock
Respondent:
Beth Drake, U.S.D.C.-Dist. of So. Car. Divs., H. D. McMaster and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Rochester v. Williams et al
as 1:2020cv01705
Petitioner:
Julian E. Rochester and J-Rock
Respondent:
B. Stirling, R. B. Harwell, S. C. Admin. Law Court and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Crowner v. Acchipinti et al
as 6:2019cv00001
Defendant:
Geraldine Rock, Mrs Sharpe, Sgt Nanna Bruce and others
Plaintiff:
Caralis Crowner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clayton v. Hunt et al
as 6:2018cv00063
Plaintiff:
Earnest B. Clayton
Defendant:
FNU Hunt, FNU Derbez, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams et al v. United States of America et al
as 1:2018cv00871
Plaintiff:
John T. Williams, Williams, Scott & Associates LLC, WSA, LLC and others
Defendant:
United States of America, FTC, Robin Rock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rock v. Averrett et al
as 4:2017cv00148
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Levon Rock
Defendant:
Averrett, Unknown Name, Alisa Hammock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Castillo v. Tolmage et al
as 6:2017cv00055
Plaintiff:
William N. Castillo
Defendant:
Tolmage, McMilliam, Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Haynes v. Gramiak et al
as 5:2017cv00016
Plaintiff:
Eric Haynes
Defendant:
Tom Gramiak, Terence Kilpatrick, Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
