Cases 41 - 50 of 98
Douglas Hoglan v. A. David Robinson
as 17-7169
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DOUGLAS A. HOGLAN
Defendant - Appellee:
A. DAVID ROBINSON, Chief of Corrections Operations for VDOC, K. CROWDER-AUSTIN, Regional Ombudsman, MARCUS ELAM, Regional Administrator and others
US v. Sean Bundy
as 17-6885
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
SEAN RONDELL BUNDY, a/k/a Bun Rock, a/k/a Humps
US v. William Meek
as 17-6756
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
WILLIAM LEWIS DONTARS MEEKS, a/k/a Willie, a/k/a Rock
US v. Richard Bryant
as 17-6603
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RICHARD L. BRYANT, a/k/a Pumpkin, a/k/a Rock
Shealy v. Rock Hill, City of et al
as 0:2017cv01194
Plaintiff:
Jay Patton Shealy
Defendant:
Rock Hill, City of , Rock Hill Police Department and York County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Darnell Cleaton v. Harold Clarke
as 16-7296
Petitioner - Appellant:
DARNELL M. CLEATON
Respondent - Appellee:
HAROLD CLARKE, Director and BERNARD W. BOOKER, Warden of Green Rock
Respondent:
UNKNOWN
John Allison v. Harold Clarke
as 16-6803
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHN ALLISON
Respondent - Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF VIRGINIA and WARDEN OF GREEN ROCK CORRECTIONAL CENTER
Darnell M. Cleaton v. Harold Clarke
as 16-6575
Petitioner - Appellant:
DARNELL M. CLEATON
Respondent - Appellee:
HAROLD CLARKE, Director and BERNARD W. BOOKER, Warden of Green Rock
Respondent:
UNKNOWN
Arthur Taylor, Jr. v. Pulliam
as 16-6509
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ARTHUR TAYLOR, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
PULLIAM, Correctional Officer and S. FULLER
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, HENDERSON, Correctional Officer, DR. WANG and others
US v. Adrian Parker
as 16-6200
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ADRIAN PARKER, a/k/a Great One, a/k/a Rock
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
