Cases 61 - 70 of 115
Rock v. Pfizer Inc
as 2:2015cv03362
Plaintiff:
Lisette Rock
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Stewart et al v. Hunt Valley Holdings LLC et al
as 0:2015cv02718
Plaintiff:
Wanda M Stewart
Defendant:
Hunt Valley Holdings LLC , Fundamental Clinical and Operational Services , Fundamental Consulting LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2015cv02330
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1982
Ramos v. Rock Hill Asia LLC et al
as 8:2015cv01381
Plaintiff:
Jose Ramos
Defendant:
Rock Hill Asia LLC , Clemson Star LLC , Hang Yang and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Davis v. York County et al
as 0:2015cv01277
Plaintiff:
Antonio Davis
Defendant:
York County, Rock Hill City Police Department and Mark Schurig
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Administrative Committee, The et al v. Hickman et al
as 4:2015cv00688
Plaintiff:
Administrative Committee, The and Rock-Tenn Company 401k Retirement Savings Plan
Defendant:
Betty Jean Hickman and Cynthia Wilkes
Cross_claimant:
Betty Jean Hickman
Cross_defendant:
Cynthia Wilkes
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Doctor v. Rock Hill, The City of et al
as 0:2015cv00265
Plaintiff:
Angela Ruth Doctor
Defendant:
Rock Hill, The City of , Chris Watts , Sarah Blair and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCleave v. Rock Hill, City of et al
as 0:2014cv04736
Plaintiff:
James McCleave
Defendant:
Rock Hill, City of , Rock Hill Police Department , Chris Watts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simpson v. Rock Hill, City of et al
as 0:2014cv03892
Plaintiff:
Joe Simpson
Defendant:
Rock Hill, City of and Ray Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rock Hill School District Three v. Liberty Mutual Surety et al
as 0:2014cv03630
Plaintiff:
Rock Hill School District Three
Defendant:
Liberty Mutual Surety and Edison Foard Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
