Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Wagner v. Hammond City et al
as 2:2016cv01376
Plaintiff:
Bryan T Wagner
Defendant:
Hammond City Jail, Hammond City Police, Hammond City and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Payne v. Hammond City et al
as 2:2015cv01022
Plaintiff:
Jennifer L Payne
Defendant:
Hammond City, Roddy Devall, Rodney Gemar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Devall v. Hammond Municipal Fire and Police Civil Service Board et al
as 2:2014cv01381
Plaintiff:
Roddy Devall
Defendant:
Hammond Municipal Fire and Police Civil Service Board , David Danel , Hammond City and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-5006
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Conerly v. Bergeron et al
as 2:2011cv03042
Plaintiff:
Kendrick D Conerly
Defendant:
Roddy Devall, Bryan McCormick, Conn Milton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv01828
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv02147
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Oscar Dantzler, Jr. v. Kathy Montecino, et al
as 09-30772
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OSCAR DANTZLER, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
KATHY MONTECINO, Individually and in her capacity as City Councilmen, NICKY MUSCARELLO, Individually and in his capacity as City Councilmen, CURTIS WILSON, Individually and in his capacity as City Councilmen and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv09516
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Harris v. Hammond City et al
as 2:2007cv03890
Plaintiff:
Henry Hugh Harris
Defendant:
Hammond City, Roddy Devall, Jeanine Cruz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
