Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Simpson v. Hickman, et al
as 2:2014cv02515
Plaintiff:
Jason Royce Simpson
Defendant:
Roderick Hickman, C. Terhune and G Lewis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Simpson v. Hickman, et al
as 1:2014cv01763
Plaintiff:
Jason Royce Simpson
Defendant:
Roderick Hickman, C. Terhune and G Lewis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Clark v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2014cv02066
Plaintiff:
Michael Clark
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation , Nevada Department of Corrections, Roderick Hickman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Byron Johnson v. David Runnels, et al
as 11-16697
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BYRON EUGENE JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID L. RUNNELS, RODERICK HICKMAN, Youth and Adult Correctional Secretary, RICHARD A. RIMMER, Former Director of CDC and others
Byron Johnson v. David Runnels, et al
as 11-16058
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BYRON EUGENE JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID L. RUNNELS, RODERICK HICKMAN, Youth and Adult Correctional Secretary, RICHARD RIMMER, Former Director of CDC and others
Bruce Cerny v. CA Board of Prison Terms, et al
as 10-56094
Petitioner - Appellee:
BRUCE ARMAND CERNY
Respondent - Appellant:
CALIFORNIA BOARD OF PRISON TERMS and RODERICK HICKMAN, Secretary of Department Corrections and Rehabilitation
Raynell Carmichael v. David Claren, et al
as 10-16151
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAYNELL CARMICHAEL
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID CLAREN, HOPKING, RODERICK HICKMAN and others
Derrick Lakey v. Roderick Hickman
as 09-15940
Petitioner - Appellant:
DERRICK LAKEY
Respondent - Appellee:
RODERICK HICKMAN
Tin Nguyen v. Roderick Hickman
as 09-15788
Petitioner - Appellant:
TIN TRI NGUYEN
Respondent - Appellee:
RODERICK HICKMAN, Warden
Lipsey v. Schwarzenegger et al
as 1:2008cv01726
Plaintiff:
Roderick Lipsey
Defendant:
Arnold Schwarzenegger, Richard Rimmer, Roderick Hickman and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
