Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Tucker v. Whitley et al
as 6:2016cv01453
Plaintiff:
Joel Todd Tucker
Defendant:
Chris Whitley, Eric Dubielak, Rodney Ingle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sparks v. Ingle et al
as 5:2014cv00013
Plaintiff:
Stacy Allen Sparks
Defendant:
Rodney Ingle, Chris Whitley and Fayette County Commission
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anglen v. Fayette County Jail et al
as 6:2012cv00666
Plaintiff:
Michael Patrick Anglen
Defendant:
Fayette County Jail, Phillip Taylor and Rodney Ingle
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anglen v. Aldredge et al
as 6:2012cv00604
Plaintiff:
Michael Patrick Anglen
Defendant:
Chad Aldredge, Rodney Ingle, Phillip Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Ingle et al
as 6:2010cv02436
Plaintiff:
Felix T. Robinson
Defendant:
Rodney Ingle, Fayette County Sheriff's Department and Fayette County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitson v. Ingle et al
as 6:2010cv01438
Petitioner:
William Gregory Whitson
Respondent:
Rodney Ingle and The Attorney General of the State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lyons v. Ingle et al
as 6:2007cv01606
Petitioner:
Mark Thomas Lyons
Respondent:
Rodney Ingle and Attorney General of the State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thomas v. Ingle
as 6:2007cv01053
Plaintiff:
Jeff Alexander Walker Thomas
Defendant:
Rodney Ingle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hammack v. Ingle et al
as 6:2007cv01039
Plaintiff:
James Randell Hammack
Defendant:
Rodney Ingle, James Sanders and Chris Whitley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lyons v. Ingle et al
as 6:2007cv00936
Plaintiff:
Mark Thomas Lyons
Defendant:
Rodney Ingle and Johnny Bruce
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
