Cases 1 - 10 of 10
COWAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv02332
Plaintiff:
RODNEY LEE COWAN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HARRINGTON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv12358
Plaintiff:
RODNEY LEE HARRINGTON
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JOHNSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv91833
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RODNEY LEE JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lyon v. Borders et al
as 5:2020cv00438
Defendant:
Gary S. Borders, Peyton C. Grinnell and bret rutzebeck
Plaintiff:
Rodney Lee Lyon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LEE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv45587
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RODNEY LEE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ARMOUR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv66997
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RODNEY LEE ARMOUR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SANCHEZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv30193
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RODNEY LEE SANCHEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PHELPS v. DUNCAN et al.
as 5:2016cv00072
Plaintiff:
RODNEY LEE PHELPS
Defendant:
DIANA DUNCAN, RAYMOND WOOD and B WELCH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phelps v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2009cv01611
Petitioner:
Rodney Lee Phelps
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Phelps v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
as 8:2009mc00045
Petitioner:
Rodney Lee Phelps
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
