Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02058
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Lyke v. Dixon Correctional Center
as 3:2021cv50066
Plaintiff:
Rodrick Lyke
Defendant:
Dixon Correctional Center, Dr. Lankz, John R. Varga and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 3:2020cv00314
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Rodrick Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thomas v. Baldwin et al
as 1:2019cv08293
Defendant:
Sgt. Rexford, Major Connor, Officer Forester and others
Plaintiff:
Tyler Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Castile v. Rodrick et al
as 1:2017cv01559
Plaintiff:
Yaphet Castile
Defendant:
. Rodrick, . Whitecotton, Todd Nelson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Royal Apartments et al v. Federal Insurance
as 2:2017cv02072
Plaintiff:
Royal Apartments USA Inc , Michael J Henneman and Rodrick L Schmidt
Defendant:
Federal Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Payton v. Kram et al
as 1:2017cv01022
Plaintiff:
Tobias Payton
Defendant:
Kram, Rodrick, Henry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Employers & Cement Masons #90 Health & Welfare Fund et al v. Century Building Group, LLC, et al
as 3:2016cv00403
Plaintiff:
Employers & Cement Masons #90 Health & Welfare Fund and Employers and Cement Masons #90 Pension Fund
Defendant:
Century Building Group, LLC and Rodrick E. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Hoskins v. Prentice et al
as 1:2015cv01248
Plaintiff:
Joshua Hoskins
Defendant:
S Prentice, Randy Pfister, B Schmeltz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01636
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
